Lithuanian Public Commission Demands Investigation of all Parties involved in the violent abuse of children on 17th May 2012

Concerned about ensuring the protection of human rights in Lithuania, as well as ensuring the maintenance of constitutional order in the State of Lithuania, feeling our professional and civic duty to intervene, when in the background of the events of Garliava the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania addresses the question of whether our State institutions are capable of ensuring the protection of constitutional values, members of the Public Commission present these conclusions on the events in Garliava:The Commission having evaluated over 50 oral and written testimonies, as well as a wealth of video and audio material, states that that violence was used against the constitutional order of the Republic of Lithuania in implementing the decision of the Kedainiai District Court of the 16th of December, 2011.

The Kedainiai District Court ruling of the 22.03.2012 to handover the girl to her biological mother without the use of violence/force was implemented on the 17.05.2012 using violence and force not only against the girl, but also against her guardian Judge Neringą Venckiene who has immunity, as well as against citizens. This means that in implementing the court decision, on behalf of the State. using force, the following Articles 3, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29, 33, 36 and 11 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania were violated. In addition, there were serious breaches of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Articles 12, 19 and 34 and its provisions supported by national legal acts (Republic of Lithuania Civil Code Article 3.164, Republic of Lithuania Civil Process Code Article 764 and so on).

The Commission has sufficient data to state that in implementing the court decision that the people’s right to free movement was unjustifiably violated, people were unduly harmed, their dignity humiliated, they were subjected to cruel treatment, people’s personal property rights were violated, public dissemination of misinformation took place, there was failure to comply with the provision that all persons are equal before officials, in addition, without the consent of the Parliament Judge Neringa Venckiene’s freedom was restricted, furthermore a clear disrespect of the Lithuanian flag was displayed.

The Commission drew attention to the fact that the use of such force and the violation of the Constitution in the State’s name were implemented in an organized manner, actions were prepared in advance and many government officials from various State and municipal authorities were included in these illegal acts. Furthermore, discussions took place in advance as to how to conceal the traces of violence; without a court sanction the video cameras installed in the house were turned away, people who could testify to the use of violence were removed from the premises; protective shields were prepared and so on. Taking all of this into account, the Commission is of the opinion, that every participant of this act of violence – from the organizers to the implementers – actions should be assessed from the point of view of the Criminal Code and Civil Code and other legislative acts. The Commission also ascertained that such an unlawful act of violence on behalf of the State is in part due to the decision of the Kedainiai District Court Judge Vitalijus Kondratjevo, which does not conform to the principles of justice and reasonableness; it was not waited for the most important in this entire story the outcomes of the pedophile case, it was failed to comply with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 12 requirements whereby it is essential to take into account the child’s opinion and wishes. The child cannot be quickly wrenched away from the environment in which she was born and grew, separated from her grandparents, relatives and close friends, as this is contrary to the principles of humanity.In the opinion of the Commission this sexual abuse against a young child case is further complicated by the fact that since 2007 the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania, for hard to understand reasons, delayed ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on “The Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse.”

The Commission drew attention to the fact that up until now the independent Parliamentary Ombudsmen and the Children’s Rights Protection Ombudsman have not reacted to the gross violations of human rights in Garliava. It is not publicly known that the Parliamentary Ombudsman and Children’s Rights Ombudsman would have started their own investigations, as this year on the 17th of May in Garliava not only were a minor, a young girl, but also Neringa Venckienė’s son were the subject of psychological abuse. Also, in the three month period since the 23rd of March 2012 the violence against the young child, Judge Neringa Venckiene’s ward, has not been investigated regardless of the fact that the Republic of Lithuania Code of Criminal Procedure Article 2 obliges the prosecutor and the investigating agencies in the shortest time possible time to investigate and uncover a criminal offense.The Commission notes that it is not possible to objectively evaluate the question of Judge Neringa Venckiene’s immunity for the following reasons and circumstances: The illegal actions of officials and other persons cannot lead to legal consequences.Without examining the circumstances of the use of violence against a minor girl on the 23rd of March and 17th of May this year, the allegations against Judge N. Venckiene can be one-sided.

We cannot evaluate Judge N. Venckienė’s actions, without firstly evaluating the infringements on the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania Article 114 by the officers and the people who used violence against the girl “A judge cannot be prosecuted, arrested, his freedom cannot be in any other way restricted without the consent of the Parliament, in the event that it is between sessions without the consent of the President of the Republic” and taking into account the Republic of Lithuania Law on Courts, Article 47, paragraph 2 “It is prohibited to enter into the living space or office facilities of a Judge, to undertake there or in the personal or official work car of the Judge, or any other personal transport vehicle an inspection, search or seizure, furthermore to inspect or search the Judge personally or search, inspect or seize his/her belongings and documents, except for those cases prescribed by law.”On the 17th of May this year Judge’s N. Venckiene’s immunity was not repealed and was still effective regardless of her location. It is not possible to blame the child’s guardian N. Venckienė because the Kedainiai District Court decision was not implemented; the girl herself expressed a clear intention to remain with her guardian. Under these circumstances the guardian did not have a moral or a legal responsibility to handover the girl by force to the mother. We note that there are no facts to show that N. Venckienė abused her responsibilities as a guardian. We cannot blame Judge, N. Venckienė for her words of sincere criticism against the real evils of the judicial system. The Commission notes that the current persecution of Judge, N. Venckienė, not only causes material harm to her, but also oppresses her personality psychologically, damages the country’s legal system and demoralizes society. The Commission is surprised that up until now the Interim Commission of the Parliament has not been given all the (footage of the child being taken) data demonstrating Judge, N. Venckienė’s potential culpability. Is this not a way of covering up breaches of the constitutional order?The Commission finds that following the implementation of the Kedainiai District Court decision that the young child who is a witness and a victim in the criminal case, has been handed over to the biological mother, against whom, adhering to the set order, she gave evidence. The current total isolation of the girl after the forced handover to her biological mother creates all the conditions for the girl’s psychological oppression and the possibility to impact on her with the aim to potentially change her evidence.

Members of the Public Commission express hope that at this critical moment, when the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania addresses the question of revoking Judge Neringa Venckienė’s legal immunity and when it is very important to protect the Lithuanian legal system and constitutional order, that the members of the Lithuanian Parliament will be very careful in their evaluation and will not adopt legally unfounded irresponsible decisions. Chairman, Commission Dr. Saulius Arlauskas Professor Mykolas Romeris University Deputy Chairman, Commission Dr. Zita Šličytė Member of the group responsible for the development of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, Deputy of the Restoration Parliament, lawyer Commission members: Vytautas Budnikas Chairman, Lithuanian Human Rights Association Kęstutis Milkeraitis Former General Prosecutor’s Office Former General Prosecutor’s Office investigator of particularly important cases, former Ombudsmen for the Parliament Kazimieras Motieka Member of the group responsible for the development of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, signatory of the March 11th Act, former Vice President of the Restoration Parliament, solicitor Associate Professor Dr. Romualdas Povilaitis Chairman, Lithuanian Human Rights Protection Association Liudvikas Narcizas Rasimas Member of the group responsible for the development of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, signatory of the March 11th Act, solicitor

Fake Video of Deimante and "Mother from Hell"

Another predictable PR stunt from the mother's team: a fake video with Deimante and a fake letter from the 'mother'. For those of you who understand Lithuanian here the detailed analysis of it: http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15048290/Falsifikatai=2012-07-25_07-00/

The summary: professionals linguistics, in film and media prove that

First, the letter the 'mother from hell' wrote about "protection of privacy" and similar bullshit, was far too sophisticated for a woman with zero education trained as a hairdresser. It is full with complex expressions that she could impossibly understand, much less master.

Second, the promotional video is fake and a failed attempt to advertise a happy mother and her girl. There is no soundtrack, the voice of Deimante cannot be heard and verified, there is only background music. Nothing that the girl does verifies that this is the real Deimante. Her face is never fully shown, but from physical indications painters and other visual artists have confirmed that this is not the girl.

And we ask: who is capable of orchestrating this massive cover up, who cares enough for a poor hairdresser to write her sophisticated letters? Why is Laima Stankunaite so important and to whom? Who considers no expense too much to secure Laima and her daughter complete isolation and protection from the public. 

We ask ourselves: if this is a fake girl, where is the real Deimante? What have 'they' done to her? Drugged and abused in total isolation from anyone who cares for her? While the mother demands more and more from the Lithuanian tax-payers?

We fear for Deimante's mental and physical state and we suspect that horrible things are done to her. We suspect that she is in such a bad state that she will never be shown to the public again, never to her closest family and to the people who love her.

In the mean time the 'mother from hell' increased her demands from the Lithuanian state from 33000 Euro to 130 000 Euro at the ECHR. Instead of being in jail, she plans to live for the rest of her life on the income from her daughter, just like she has done ever since Deimante was born.

Only Neringa Venckiene can save the girl.

Take down the Government!

Lithuanian government abuses innocent people. This government and all who hold power in Lithuania today must go! They cannot stay in power after this!

The Lithuanian people must take the power away from them!

Next Steps: Take political power!

(Dont worry, people, this blog will NEVER shut down. We have a backup and even if we get trouble on blogger.com - which we do not expect but you never know - we will simply move it to other private locations. We are rather busy and need help with posting. We need material - tips, updates, facts and media etc)

The destruction of witnesses and people who fight for justice goes on according to a plan developed by the CIA trained Secret Service of Lithuania on government (and their sponsors) orders. The forces of this cover up are the usual: the police, Secret Service, and media, and the whole government administration. Proof that the CIA (and for some reason a pedophile clan, probably because these people, being corrupt, are easy to control) has long ago taken over Lithuania is that this cover up is done according to the CIA blueprint that was used in other massive CIA-type cover ups (the Kennedy assassination, the WTC scam).

The essence of it is this:

Few people at the top of the state of Lithuania (the political top: president Dalia Grybauskaite, government, police chiefs, Secret Service men) have conspired to commit crimes one of which is the abuse of children. The president and government orders the Secret Service to develop a plan to destroy any witnesses and evidence. The rest of the Lithuanian public administration and the Secret Service controlled media executes the cover up.

Lithuania was subverted years ago by the CIA agent V. Adamkus. His CIA past, as well as him previously being a Nazi-agent, is documented and a matter of fact (see another article published on this blog). That he was and is a CIA operative is established beyond reasonable doubt. His actions speak for themselves: for example he permitted the building of a secret CIA prison for interrogation and torture of 'terrorists' and covered up (I dont know of such a prison, he said) the crime. In action and speech he reduces the people who have risen to demand justice to a "mob", meaning they are degenerates and trash that have to be removed so that Lithuania can be free and just. We have heard and seen this rhetoric and exact same language deployed by Secret Service operatives like V. Davoliute and Diapkus in the dominating media.  Adamkus has set the tone of contempt for the honest and decent people of Lithuania that echoes through all controlled media in Lithuania and abroad.

He was the one who put the deeply corrupt system in place in Lithuania, in which the criminals control the full apparatus of that state, and use the judiciary to put themselves beyond punishment. Every and any public attempt to take away the power from them is defined as 'mob rule' and therefore 'illegal'. We have to understand that these people are fighting a battle of life and death, they are fighting for their own political survival. Therefore we must be prepared that they will use every tool in their power to kill and destroy their opponents. The Secret Service of Lithuania (just like the CIA in the assassination of JFK) is only a tool for those who hold the power in Lithuania today.

Control of the media has reached such massive proportions that any attempt to tell the truth is brutally suppressed and the only promoted version is this of those in power.

Neringa Venckiene and Deimante Kedyte and the thousands of abused people and children cannot be saved by words. Those in power in Lithuania do not care what we know or what we say, all they care about is what we do. They fear our actions, especially our political actions. They fear that we will take the power away from them.

We think we have published a critical mass of evidence (or pointed at evidence and witnesses) in this blog to prove beyond doubt that Deimante Kedyte was abused by powerful pedophiles, that she, her murdered father and her aunt Neringa Venckiene were telling and are telling the the truth - the only truth.

The facts indicate that the state of Lithuania is so corrupt that it has lost any sense of self-preservation. The state wages a war on its own population, on the decent innocent citizens and (even unborn) children.

We challenge each of you to take action. Be courageous! Offer your loyalty and services to Neringa Venckiene as she is the strongest political force and main hope to save Lithuania and give the country back to its people. She is the only one who can save Deimante.

Help us to keep this blog updated. We ask you to send us material and updates as a comment and we will publish it.

Deimante's Self-Interview (while in Neringa's house)

Deimante in her own words:
In this short video Deimante recorded while still in Neringa's house, the girl pretends that she is interviewed by a TV presenter. She says that Laima (her mother) hurt her in the 23th March attempt to abduct her, then wrote her a letter, and Deimante says she does not want to even see Laima. Never.

Translation:
Hello, this is a program about... I would like to tell you about a girl. She is exactly 8 years old right now. We would like.. her.. well we cannot ask her now. But we would really like to ask her. But we cant. Therefore I will tell everything for her... cause we questioned her about it & obviously I will tell you. Ok, lets continue. She is 8 years old & they wanted to abduct her, but for some reason they didn't succeed. It just happened like that. But the girl had injuries on the neck and stomach. She was very injured... by the way... Ms Laima Stankunaite wrote to her daughter and the daughter wrote back completely badly... she wrote: I do not want to live with you... and that I DO NOT WANT TO LIVE WITH YOU. And you do not need to come anymore. And it is not worth to continue writing.

Committee Voted to Remove Neringa's Immunity without Evidence

These six people in the specially set up committee voted to propose to the parliament to remove the immunity of Neringa Venckiene - without any evidence against her. They were ready to act on government orders and help put an innocent person in jail.

Their names are: Evaldas Jurkevičius, Stasys Šedbaras, Julius Sabatauskas, Jonas Juozapaitis, Arūnė Stirblytė, Dalia Kuodytė. 



The good guys, those who voted against removing the immunity of an innocent person without any evidence of wrongdoing are:  Rytas Kupčinskas, Naglis Puteikis, Jonas Ramonas, Mečislovas Zasčiurinskas ir Rimas Antanas Ručys.

Evaldas Lementauskas did not vote.

Parliament Removed Neringa Venckiene's Immunity: Without Evidence

Today, the Lithuanian parliament on the recommendation of a special purpose committee voted to remove judge Neringa Venckiene's immunity so that she can be prosecuted for fake charges. The goal is to put her in jail and remove her from the political stage, to break the hope of Lithuanian people that the country can be saved from abuse and corruption and that criminals can be brought to justice. 

This is how they voted of parliament voted:

FOR (73): Adomenas Mantas, Aleknaite Abramikiene Vilija, Anusauskas Arvydas, Andriukaitis Vytenis, Povilas Austrevicius Petras, Azubalis Audronius, Babilius Vincas, Bacevicius Vaidotas, Baltraitiene Virginija, Bastys Mindaugas, Bekintiene Danute, Bogusis Vytautas, Bradauskas Bronius, Bucevicius Saulius, Budrys Dainius, Butkevicius Algirdas, Caplikas Algis, Cigriejiene Vida Marija, Dauksys Kestutis, Dautartas Julius, Degutiene Irena, Dinius Laimontas, Endzinas Audrius, Giedraitis Stanislovas, Glaveckas Kestutis, Jagminas Jonas, Jankauskas Donatas, Jonyla Edmundas, Jukneviciene Rasa, Juozapaitis Jonas, Jurkevicius Evaldas, Jursenas Ceslovas, Kaseta Algis, Kubilius Andrius, Kuodyte Dalia, Lydeka Arminas, Liesys Jonas, Masiulis Eligijus, Masiulis Kestutis, Matulas Antanas, Nedzinskas Antanas, Olekas Juozas, Pauza Bronius, Pavilioniene Marija Ausrine, Peceliunas Saulius, Petrauskiene Milda, Pupinis Edmundas, Ramelis Konstantas, Razma Jurgis, Rutkelyte Ruta, Sabatauskas Julius, Salamakinas Algimantas, Sinkevicius Rimantas, Sysas Algirdas, Stankevicius Ceslovas Vytautas, Starkevicius Kazys, Steponavicius Gintaras, Stirblyte Arune, Stundys Valentinas, Sedbaras Stasys, Siauliene Irena, Sukys Raimondas, Tamasauskas Erikas, Teiserskyte Dalia, Valinskas Arunas, Valinskiene Ingrida, Varaska Mantas, Vareikis Egidijus, Veselka Julius, Vidziunas Arvydas, Zingeris Emanuelis, Zeimys Pranas, Zilinskas Rokas

AGAINST (20): Baukute Asta, Kernagis Ligitas, Kondrotas Jonas, Kupcinskas Rytas, Luomanas Petras, Margeviciene Vince Vaidevute, Puteikis Naglis, Ramanauskaite-Skokauskiene Auksute, Ramonas Jonas, Sacharuk Aleksandr, Saudargas Paulius, Smetona Rimantas, Songaila Gintaras, Stancikiene Aurelija, Stanevicius Jonas, Stoma Saulius, Simenas Jonas, Uoka Kazimieras, Uzlyte Zita, Zasciurinskas Mecislovas.

ABSTAINED (9): Baskiene Rima, Bilotaite Agne, Bukauskas Valentinas, Kazulenas Algis, Kuzminskas Kazimieras, Mitrulevičius Albinas, Silgalis Zilvinas, Valkiunas Valdemaras, Zuokiene Agne.